The IUSB Vision Weblog

The way to crush the middle class is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation. – Vladimir Lenin

Archive for August 22nd, 2008

Democrat Web Advertisement – Eric Cantor is a JEW!!@!@!

Posted by iusbvision on August 22, 2008

UPDATE – scrubbed the site of several of the jewish references.

Hat Tip

Growing antisemitism among the left just had another piece of evidence added to the stack today. The statements below come from a single web advertisement against possible Vice Presidential candidate Eric Cantor.

“the party’s most visible liaison to Jewish groups”

“money from the Jewish community”

“Both Abramoff and Cantor are Jewish”

“the only Jewish Republican”

“a deli special that exudes Jewish power”

Sickening. My upcoming book will feature a chapter – a large chapter – on antisemitism among leftist academics. Maybe they will be happy to find out that among the left they are not alone.

UPDATE: Random Thought – How people can engage in such filthy bigotry and call themselves Americans is something I can never fully understand. It literally makes me sick to my stomach when I attempt to fathom it.

Posted in Campaign 2008, Chuck Norton, Israel, Journalism Is Dead, Other Links | Leave a Comment »

Video – Education Bureaucrats in Action!!

Posted by iusbvision on August 22, 2008

From Dr. John Lott who says, “Finally a convincing explanation for why we need government education bureaucrats.”

WARNING – This is hilarious, yet so true.

Posted in Campus Freedom, Indoctrination & Censorship, Chuck Norton, Other Links | Leave a Comment »

Georgian President Interviewed on CNN – VIDEO

Posted by iusbvision on August 22, 2008

MsUnderestimated has a CNN video of Glenn Beck’s interview with Georgian President Saakkashvili.

Please download and watch the video and share it with your friends. It is in three parts. Follow the link and pay close attention to video number two.

What will be amazing to some of you, which is no surprise to me, is that Gorbechev is spouting Putin’s propaganda line from stem to stern in his NYT Op-Ed. Leftist academia and many new college text books portray Gorby as a visionary for peace who single single-handedly ended the evil Soviet Union.  Once again, nothing could be further from the truth. I was a part of the cold war and I was paying very close attention during that time. Here is a link to what Gorby had to say. I could post a detailed refutation, but many  pundits have done so already.

Master historian Victor Davis Hanson has a view of the conflict based on reality and history. His column on the issue tells it like it is.

Posted in Other Links | Leave a Comment »

Brilliant Black Conservative Web Site

Posted by iusbvision on August 22, 2008

Watch these video’s and learn something. This man is not bashful. He may offend you. Here is the link:

Here is another site with videos by young conservatives:

Posted in Campaign 2008, Chuck Norton, Other Links | Leave a Comment »

FIRE and SAF Dispute Over Terrorism Awareness Project – UPDATE: Dispute Resolved.

Posted by iusbvision on August 22, 2008

(Updated 11:15 AM)

Update II – Good News, See Below.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Education (FIRE) and Students for Academic Freedom (SAF) butted heads in recent days on the internet. I think both sides make good points and should open a dialogue.

SAF called for the defunding of Muslim Students Associations that fall under the criteria mentioned on its web site and FIRE retorted saying that even if these allegations are true it doesn’t matter and FIRE will defend them no matter what.

With all due respect to both organizations who have been allies and dear friends of mine; to a degree you are both right and are also both wrong. As with so many issues the devil is in the details.

The courts have set very limited criteria for what kind of censorship is allowed in a campus environment. Schools do not have to subsidize the speech of those who advocate criminal behavior, it does not have to subsidize those who engage in hate and intimidation that crosses the legal standard. Does this mean that a certain degree of hate is allowed by the courts? The answer is yes. The most offensive subjects can be studied in a scholarly manner and even reasonably advocated.

FIRE is spot on when it said,

Let’s take a look at two examples of expression for which TAP is calling on universities to defund MSA chapters. In the “Defunding the Muslim Student Association” document, TAP claims, among other things, that “[t]he University of Southern California chapter brazenly displays the Islamic hadith (‘holy teaching’) calling for the murder of all Jews on its website,” and that “[t]he MSA national headquarters recently sent Islamic bigot Sheikh Khalid Yasin to Penn State, Ohio State, the University of Minnesota and other major campuses…Sheik Yasin has said that the U.S. government was behind 9/11; that homosexuals should be put to death; that AIDS was invented in U.S. government laboratories; and that Jews are ‘filth’ deserving of death.”

While many people might strongly object to these opinions, there is no room under the First Amendment to punish a group simply for presenting or sponsoring expression that angers, offends, or even “incites hatred” of someone else.

While FIRE is quite correct in it’s legal analysis, I must also point out for example, that hate and intimidation can cross the legal line when such hate and intimidation creates a repetitive, ongoing, very hostile or threatening environment for Jewish students to the level that it jeopardizes the educational mission. Obviously if you are frightened to go to class or feel threatened in ways that are justified and rational it would certainly interfere with the university’s mission to educate you. The courts have made it clear that such hate and intimidation has to go beyond scholarly exploration, mere offensiveness, and the limits mentioned above to lose free speech protections on campus.

It is no secret that I am authoring a book on declining campus culture. My book has a chapter on campus antisemitism. I know that FIRE and SAF are well aware of cases and incidents where Jewish students and faculty have suffered illegal discrimination and hostility.

If an MSA advocates genocide or ethnic cleansing should they be denied student funds? According to my reading of case law it depends on how they say it and how it is advocated, once again the devil is in the details. One can always call the US Commission on Civil Rights, which as of 2006 is taking antisemitism and anti-Israelism on campus more seriously. One can also call the US Department of Education Office of Civil Rights as well. It is possible that these government agencies can give guidelines or advice as to what in their view crosses the legal line.

SAF alleges that some Muslim Student Associations have ties to terror groups or illegal terrorist charities. If this is the case the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI should be brought in to verify these claims on a case by case basis. Colleges are under no obligation to subsidize criminal activity with student funds.

Another line that should not be crossed in my view is the advocating of the violent overthrow of the United States Government. There are some people from CAIR (Council for American Islamic Relations) who have said that the US Constitution should be replaced with Sharia Law as the highest law in the land. Saying it should is one thing, but advocating the government’s overthrow by means of force crosses the line when I am forced to subsidize it with my tax dollars and student fees.

SAF alleges that MSA’s have intimidated college press and torn down fliers and other communications of student groups they oppose. Once again the details are important here. How was the college press intimidated? There is currently a pro-Muslim political correctness on many college campuses that attempts to shame those who criticize Islam. Intimidation by political correctness is not enough. Student press must have the spine to stand up to politically correct pressures and contact FIRE and SAF if faculty and administration put that pressure on. Intimidation, as explained above, has to cross a legal standard. Attempts to censor student press by college faculty and administration should not be tolerated. If MSA’s tear down the fliers of other student groups, colleges can punish those students by expelling them, fining them, putting them on probation or even suspending their funding for a period of time that is reasonable to the offense. If college administrations are unwilling to do the right thing when there are violations, FIRE and SAF need to be called.

In my view SAF should clarify and narrow its policy on the defunding of MSA’s to bring it in line with federal law and case law. If you don’t you will be setting yourself up for a defeat. There is no question that SAF’s defunding policy statement is overly broad.

FIRE also stated:

FIRE has no way of determining whether TAP’s claims about the MSA are true, false, or somewhere in between, and for our purposes it doesn’t matter. However, we do know how to tell when someone is calling for a group to be punished for its expressiondefunding a campus group is certainly punishmentand TAP appears to be doing just that.

This statement is for the most part true; is also overly broad, but is made with the right spirit. If some MSA’s have funding or other illegal ties with terrorist organizations and/or illegal terrorist supporting charities and it can be reasonably demonstrated; colleges should not fund such an MSA and Homeland Security and the FBI should be called. Some of SAF’s allegations, if true may cross some of the legal standards written above and for example, I know FIRE does not want to see Jewish students illegally intimidated.

I am confident that FIRE does not want MSA’s, or anyone else for that matter, to break the law, tear down other student group fliers, intimidate other students or student press etc. So if some of SAF’s claims are true and violate the law, it may indeed matter.

I am aware that SAF and FIRE have good lines of communications available to them. In my view both groups should have a dialogue. A healthy dialogue about when the legal lines are crossed and what constitutes legal grey areas can be a a real benefit to those interested in such issues.

Update II – Good News

SAF is amending its defunding policy to bring it into compliance with the law and FIRE has sent me a clarification on their statement as well. FIRE and SAF had the dialogue that I was hoping for and it looks like the dispute has been settled.

When people who really care about right and wrong make mistakes, there is a dialogue and such people act quickly to resolve those mistakes. FIRE and SAF worked together to resolve the problem in such a way that everyone wins and they accomplished this in a remarkably short period of time. Now if only university administrators who make six figure salaries could be so responsive in such a positive way imagine how much better our education institutions would be.

FIRE and SAF are both dedicated organizations that are worthy of your donations. Please consider donating to them today.

Posted in Campus Freedom, Indoctrination & Censorship, Chuck Norton, Israel, Other Links | Leave a Comment »