The IUSB Vision Weblog

The way to crush the middle class is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation. – Vladimir Lenin

Obama Administration: You have no reasonable expectation of privacy in email or cell phones or…

Posted by iusbvision on May 14, 2010

Imagine the reaction if the Bush Administration had argued this.

Read carefully.

Via CNET News:

Google and an alliance of privacy groups have come to Yahoo’s aid by helping the Web portal fend off a broad request from the U.S. Department of Justice for e-mail messages, CNET has learned.

In a brief filed Tuesday afternoon, the coalition says a search warrant signed by a judge is necessary before the FBI or other police agencies can read the contents of Yahoo Mail messages–a position that puts those companies directly at odds with the Obama administration.

Yahoo has been quietly fighting prosecutors’ requests in front of a federal judge in Colorado, with many documents filed under seal. Tuesday’s brief from Google and the other groups aims to buttress Yahoo’s position by saying users who store their e-mail in the cloud enjoy a reasonable expectation of privacy that is protected by the U.S. Constitution.

“Society expects and relies on the privacy of e-mail messages just as it relies on the privacy of the telephone system,” the friend-of-the-court brief says. “Indeed, the largest e-mail services are popular precisely because they offer users huge amounts of computer disk space in the Internet ‘cloud’ within which users can warehouse their e-mails for perpetual storage.”

The coalition also includes the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Center for Democracy and Technology, the Progress and Freedom Foundation, the Computer and Communications Industry Association, and TRUSTe.

For its part, the Justice Department has taken a legalistic approach: a 17-page brief it filed last month acknowledges that federal law requires search warrants for messages in “electronic storage” that are less than 181 days old. But, Assistant U.S. Attorney Pegeen Rhyne writes in a government brief, the Yahoo Mail messages don’t meet that definition.

“Previously opened e-mail is not in ‘electronic storage,'” Rhyne wrote in a motion filed last month. “This court should therefore require Yahoo to comply with the order and produce the specified communications in the targeted accounts.” (The Justice Department’s position is that what’s known as a 2703(d) order–not as privacy-protective as the rules for search warrants–should let police read e-mail.)

On December 3, 2009, U.S. Magistrate Judge Craig Shaffer ordered Yahoo to hand to prosecutors certain records including the contents of e-mail messages. Yahoo divulged some of the data but refused to turn over e-mail that had been previously viewed, accessed, or downloaded and was less than 181 days old.


A few weeks ago, for instance, Justice Department prosecutors told a federal appeals court that Americans enjoy no reasonable expectation of privacy in their mobile device’s location and that no search warrant should be required to access location logs.

NewsReal has a fantastic post with even more details and what this means for you.

Glenn Beck comments and ends up having a ball making fun of those who called him nuts when he was predicting much of this:

After much heat the administration is now backing off the position that you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in email, but only because the blogosphere and Fox went nuts about this and if it went to court the elite media likely would have had to report on it. No one who is even close to normal thinks that you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in email; yet the administration pushed this point of view till it was politically untenable for them. It speaks volumes about the mentality of this administration.

2 Responses to “Obama Administration: You have no reasonable expectation of privacy in email or cell phones or…”

  1. Paul Geer said

    Obama, the Little Man-Child, is up, to or past, the point where he believe he can do anything he wants and nobody can stop it.

  2. The right of individuals to privacy must be protected. Our liberty as a human person will already be taken away from us if this violation of our right is permitted. The administration has no right at all to take that liberty away.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: